The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012.
The bar chart depicts the aggregate school expenditure in Singapore, and the pie chart gives information on how many Singaporean students received tertiary education diplomas and degrees between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, throughout the time period, male students spend more money on education than their female counterparts. In addition, in terms of qualifications, diplomas were gained significantly more than degrees over the course of twelve years.
As per the bar chart, in 2000, there was no prominent difference between the expense of boys and girls, however, in the next two years, the gap was exaggerated as the males’ spending doubled whereas that of the females only witnessed a slight increase. Nevertheless, the trend is different for 2008 when the expenditure of the girls reached a plateau of somewhere in the vicinity of 10 million dollars while the spending of the boys had reached the 25-million-dollars mark. By the end of the time period, the school spendings of both genders saw a five-million-dollars increase, which made up for the 30 million and 20 million of boy’s and girl’s, respectively. When considering the bar chart, from the ratio of 3:7 for female and male expenditure, in 2012, it changed to a mere 1:2 as there were fewer diplomas and more degrees received.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | hongchau | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Minty@1411 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- The plans show an office in a university in 2005 and the same office now 79
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television Discuss both sides 78
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many young people change their jobs and careers What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16014365757 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0288665153 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.428571429 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236665260659 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113081283461 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104762337573 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191286964501 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10617053406 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.