The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university
The table illustrates the survey of the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in the year of 2000, 2005 and 2010.
It is clear from the chart that there were increases in the percentage of students highly rated for teaching quality and electronic resources. By contrast, the proportion of students giving good ratings for print resources, range of modules offered and buildings/teaching facilities went down slightly and remained stable.
From 2000 to 2010, the group involved teaching quality and electronic resources grew consistently. A massive 65% of students rated for teaching quality and this number continued to rise to 63% in 2005 and 69% in 2010. Furthermore, the figure for electronic resources increased dramatically from 45% to 88%. In 2010, it reached a high peak at 88%.
Between 2000 and 2010, the proportion of students choosing print resources, range of modules offered and buildings/ teaching facilities almost decreased and held steady.In 2000, a hefty 87% of students voted for print resources. This number increased slightly to 89% in 2005, however, it dipped to 88% in 2010. In addition, there was a considerable decline to 27% in the percentage of students giving ratings for range of modules offered.Moreover, the figure for buildings/teaching facilities stayed constant at 77% in 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | Pthao_0108 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | nhi lê | view | |
| 2020-02-09 | GM_jurabek | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | siddique148018 | 26 | view |
| 2014-06-30 | luckysun | 89 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What effects can this have on their future careers Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your knowledge and experience Write a 76
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words The table below shows the results o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty in the year of 2000, 2005 and 2010. It is clear from the chart that there we...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rint resources, range of modules offered and buildings/teaching facilities went d...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt down slightly and remained stable. From 2000 to 2010, the group involved te...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In 2010, it reached a high peak at 88%. Between 2000 and 2010, the proportion of...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to print'
Suggestion: to print
...10, the proportion of students choosing print resources, range of modules offered and...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lities almost decreased and held steady.In 2000, a hefty 87% of students voted for...
^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ng ratings for range of modules offered.Moreover, the figure for buildings/teaching faci...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31050228311 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14893737519 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470319634703 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9430061615 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.3 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088086268517 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487077030348 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473835637654 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767318188252 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604353453725 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.