The pie charts below show the proportions of energy produced from 5 sources in a country in 1995 and 2003
The given pie charts illustrate the changes and differences in the percentages of energy provided by five different elements in a country in 1995 and 2003. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in most researched fields, except for nuclear that bucked the trend. Noticeably, the most remarkable change could be found in the figure of coal energy.
In particular, when it comes to nuclear power, the graph witnessed a sharp decrease of 20% in the percentage of energy from 59% in 1985 to 39% in 2003, which accounted for the highest scores over the period.
In stark contrast, in terms of other sources of energy, the proportion stood at 3% in 1985, then increased slightly to 4% in 2003, which constantly constituted the smallest percentages. Concerning Hydrogen, a double growth from 7% in 1985 to 14% in 2003 was experienced in this figure. Besides, regarding coal and oil, the percentages of energy were at 5%, 23% respectively before rising to 32% for the former and 31% for the later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | maiphuong0610 | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
- the chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 73
- The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006 73
- The given scheme describes the production process of instant noodles 78
- The chart below gives some information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 59
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, so, then, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85795454545 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71863570815 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 290.88556701 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5689134029 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 76.5299724578 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 16.8248392259 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 4.34317383033 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229222808495 0.216113520407 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915227135949 0.0766984524023 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820658517622 0.0603063233224 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137155840889 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322960815405 0.0580467560999 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 8.37731958763 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.