Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Whether students should study the science of food and know how to cook or focus on learning vital subjects is a controversial issue. Both viewpoints are justìiable, but I personally lean towards the latter.
Firstly, learning about food can enhance students’ physical health. For example, students know to calculate calories per serving together with the food ration required for their bodies. Only when having a sufficient understanding about food, can students limit fast-food or unhealthy diets, which can prevent obesity in the young. As a result, students will grow height effectively and have a well-proportioned body. Besides, students can provide enough nutrition with suitable eating-time. Therefore, they not only fulfill with energy but they can also concentrate more on their work. Since then their productivity on studying and performance results can increase remarkably.
On the other hand, spending more time on crucial subjects means students are having more than opportunities to enhance their personal abilities. These subjects not only give them basic knowledge to explore themselves but they also develop their hard skills to adapt practical problems in the future. For instance, science subjects will explain real situations in life whereas social subjects let students understand their culture and express their abilities. As a result, students will be prepared solid knowledge and realistic experiences to apply for their future jobs such as write resume or response to interview questions
In conclusion, learning the science of food or crucial subjects benefits students in myriad ways. Schools should balance their educational system and apply these subjects efficiently based on the students’ situations. I personally think besides vital subjects, school should hold some workshops or orientation days about the importance of food to give students a better understanding of nutrition for teenagers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... then their productivity on studying and performance results can increase remarka...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66551724138 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88785434793 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1807116343 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282208528132 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941324968601 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776752499064 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198654586708 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967409321472 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.