The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given picture depicts the method of producing carbonated beverages.
As can be seen from the flow chart, there are totally 5 stages in the process of manufacturing carbonated drinks, beginning with cleaning raw water and ending with delivering the finished products to a supermarket.
At the initial stage of the process, raw water is collected and then filtered to remove any impurities. Next, the cleaned water flows into a container, where it is softened with chemicals, before being pumped into electric heaters. After passing through cooling pipes, the resulting water is transferred to a tank, which contains a host of carbon dioxide. After this step, the water becomes carbonated.
The following stage of the process is to pump the carbonated water into a mixing tank. In this tank, the water is mixed with colouring, syrup and flavour. The mixture then undergoes a process called filtration before being either bottled or canned. Finally, these bottles and cans of fizzy drinks are packaged and then distributed to a supermarket for sales.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-21 nobitaa 73 view
2024-12-17 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 56 view
Essays by user Musashi :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21764705882 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73329465188 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9122989605 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806884082978 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034493558233 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229022381012 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524495834242 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00966843149657 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.