The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
People use electronic media to communicate with each other more and more these days, rather than having face-to-face contact or speaking to each other. This can affect their relationships with other people. But is the effect necessarily a negative one? It is easy to see that electronic media brings numerous outstanding advantages. It revolutionizes the way we communicate today. For instance, we can make new friends through social media and keep our friends up to date with everything they're doing. People can extend their group of friends very quickly and easily. We can also contact each other immediately and it allows friends and family overseas to keep in touch as well as stay connected. On the other hand, there can be negative effects too. Many cases have been proved that some people react and treat each other actively and enthusiastically when they have a conversation on electronic media. Nevertheless, they become awkward and shy when it comes to face-to-face contact, on the contrary, they feel confident with chatting through a device. Nowadays, people just depend on social media too much that makes them lack communication. Besides that, some people don't bother to respond to communications via text messages or emails and this can upset people who have sent them. Overall, communicating through electronic media can cause some problems between people, and obviously, it can't replace meeting and talking face-to-face - which strongly built a good relationship for people. But in my personal opinion, it can still has more positive than negative effects, as long as we know how to balance our relationship with people at any aspect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | Hoangnhi2802 | 56 | view |
- The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 489, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... our friends up to date with everything theyre doing. People can extend their group of...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ommunication. Besides that, some people dont bother to respond to communications via...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1392, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...blems between people, and obviously, it cant replace meeting and talking face-to-fac...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1392, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...blems between people, and obviously, it cant replace meeting and talking face-to-fac...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1503, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...good relationship for people. But in my personal opinion, it can still has more positive than ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1534, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ut in my personal opinion, it can still has more positive than negative effects, as...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20676691729 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87872000278 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612781954887 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9228871684 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206503615471 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744906091641 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475617175349 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206503615471 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.