The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie graph depicts different types of career done by Anthropology graduates after acquiring their bachelor’s degree. Meanwhile, the table compares their income earned in different occupations after 5 years
Overall, a majority of Anthropology graduates engaged with full-time work, while the opposition was seen in part-time work and postgrad study. In addition, Anthropology made the most money out of freelance consultants and government sector
Regarding the pie chart, apparently full-time job constituted more than half of the total destinations for Anthropology graduates. In contrast, the figure for those who were part-time employees or did postgrad study was remarkably low with merely 5%. Graduates who was unknown about what to do and those who did postgrad study full time shared the same proportion of 8%. Finally, the remaining figures accounted for around 12% to 15% of the whole chart
After 5 years of working, a vast majority of Anthropology graduates working in government sector, pivate companies and as freelance consultants received a significantly high minimum wage which was $100,000 ( 50%, 30% and 40% respectively). On the other hand, there was only 5% seen in the salaries between $25,000 and $49,999 of freelance consultants and government sector worked by Anthropology, which was doubled by the figure for that of private companies. Nontheless, when it comes to the range of income from $75,000 to $99,999, the percentage of employees in private companies was lower than that of freelance consultants and government sector 5 to 15%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 930 and in 2010 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- HOW ETHANOL FUEL IS PRODUCED FROM CORN 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... to do and those who did postgrad study full time shared the same proportion of 8%. Final...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antly high minimum wage which was 00,000 50%, 30% and 40% respectively. On the ot...
^^
Line 7, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsultants and government sector 5 to 15%
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, if, regarding, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43621399177 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03150041236 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572016460905 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8879660328 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.125 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17727861835 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083672434879 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565947661973 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116395128328 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055863287369 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.