The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the production of five different kinds of energy such as coal, gas, petrol, nuclear and other sources in France in the year 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the amount of energy created from gas and coal in France had a big percentage in 1995 and continued to grow minimally in 2005. In contrast, the rate of nuclear energy and other sources generated was lower than other three kinds of energy produced in both 2 years shown.
In 1995, the rate of coal energy production in France was the highest at about 29,80% and was a little bit higher than the figure for the energy created from gas, around 0,15%. During the next 10 years, both kinds of that energy sources rose slightly and the figure for that of coal energy was still higher than that of gas energy generated.
Regarding to the rest ones, the amount of petrol energy produced also had a big number of percent, at about 29,27 % in the year 1995, then this figure declined considerably by around 10%, which reached 19.55% in 2005, whereas the rate of energy created from nuclear and other sources in France experienced a minimum climb in two years shown. However, the expenditure for energy production spent on nuclear energy still kept the low rate, accounting for one tenth the amount of energy generated in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s the highest at about 29,80% and was a little bit higher than the figure for the energy c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, then, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65652173913 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23254102444 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0964747157 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312744084753 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183182383445 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891684899189 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243946754611 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863641042641 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.