Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your opinion
Nowadays, several industries have made compulsory for their trader to wear and tear inflexible. Companies restrict staff to wear and tear another frock. In my point of view, the gown code should be mandatory for employees. One type of garment enhances the discipline at the workplace and also provide identity to the laborer in office. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of wearing homogeneous in the corporation.
To commence with, there are numerous merits of wearing the same costume in institutions. First and foremost, garb grants identity to the workforce at the workplace. For instance, when workers wear rigid in an agency then they look unique from other people. This assist customer to recognize the employees easily in particular corporations whenever they need any assistance, which hikes reputation of industries, therefore, hired man is forced to wear specific attire in an organization. In addition, homogeneous also save the money of the mortals. This is due to the fact they do not need to buy various types of sportswear for the workplace. For example, a number of individuals purchase expensive for looking attractive in the office. They spend their half of salary on wardrobe, on the contrary having dress code in instruction save their expenses. Hence, wearing alike attire is fruitful for masses.
On the other hand, there are several demerits of wearing a uniform. Firstly, wage-earner start to feel boring after wearing the same type of clothes every day. Which decrease their confidence level and they also feel unmotivated. This put a direct impact on their performance which is lethal for any industry. Secondly, a number of folks change their corporation due to the same suit owing to the fact that certain people have the habit to wear distinct kinds of regalia. They want to follow the latest trend, on the contrary by gown code, they are not able to wear whatever they want. Consequently, companies should accord freedom to the laborer for wearing anything.
In conclusion, no doubt, peasants start to feel boring after wearing a similar category of stuff every day on the contrary outfit boost the discipline and gives identity to the worker in an organization. Thus, staff should wear the matching costumes all the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | ankitbishnoi | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11859838275 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71823228797 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544474393531 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7320419531 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5652173913 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21739130435 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175073438576 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538611684384 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389584613769 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112652912448 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256520522166 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.