Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, reading stories from books has been considered to be more beneficial than watching television or playing e-sport games for children. From my perspectives, I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, books can be regarded as a knowledgeable and reliable resource to nurture the children. This is because every stories from books are commonly woven from the practical and exciting experience about different aspects of social life from the authors, so they can bring back helpful and valuable lessons. Also, several characters from those stories might set a good pattern for children to follow. For example, more and more children are considerably keen on the character named Harry Potter due to his bravery and intelligence and they wish to become like him. In addition, stories from books can boost essential skills that they need to be developed while watching TV or playing online games are more likely to trigger harmful impacts on physical and mental health. If the contents of these stories are comparatively appealing, children will easily be immersed in every lines from each pages to understand. This will probably lead to the improvement in language skills and cognitive skills that promotes their productivity in their daily activites.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that TV and computer games somehow have positive influences on children’s growth. Firstly, a number of books are relatively monotonous and difficult for young readers to comprehend the wide range of information related to academic fields. Conversely, several TV programs or virtual games have ability to support this issue. For instance, if they do not have any chances to pay a visit to historical sites, they might explore them through tourism channels on TV. Furthermore, programs on TV and e-sport games often blend the real fact with the fantasy which puts a great impression on young children. This can help the gain knowledge while playing and watching.
In conclusion, it is true that reading stories from books will affect positively on children in spite of a few drawbacks. However, thanks to the universal spread of the technology, I believe that both of these methods shoulded be mixed in order that children will be well-qualifed people in the forthcoming future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 92
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 67
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22554347826 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77963363165 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573369565217 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0113228589 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.117647059 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338677577033 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103553246331 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742239715052 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215440385343 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650555268321 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22554347826 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77963363165 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573369565217 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0113228589 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.117647059 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338677577033 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103553246331 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742239715052 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215440385343 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650555268321 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.