Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Whether workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than they do similar tasks all day long depends primarily on specific situation. However, in many cases, workers seem to get more fulfilled when they cross over diverse challenges, thus, I fundamentally agree with the statement.
Admittedly, some people will be happier to stay in their comfort zone, doing the similar mission day after day, which will not be a problem for them. However, when we get the chance to challenge ourselves, the opportunity to deal with different kinds of situations, which we can be excited by the unknown obstacles, rather be frightened by them. For instance, a worker will not stop to take another step after completed his first mission in the company, he will be eager to seek other opportunities, no matter what his goal is, the money or the fame; moreover, through this upward mobility process, the satisfaction feeling of accomplishment can be as one of the crucial ingredients to drive him forward continuously.
Secondly, challenging ourselves in various fields of study broaden our perception and evoke our sleeping brain. To be more specific, taking tasks will keep our mind in a more dynamic status. If a workers get used to certain type of activity, their productivity will decline and lead to the low efficiency of the company. To avoid such situation, most companies hold classes for their employees, hopping to reach a win-win situation for both side between the workers and the owners. While corporation aim to train more talents to keep up on the trend of the business world, employees searching for more possibilities of promotion after the growth. By doing so, workers can get to understand more information in other parts of the industry, moreover, learn the new side of the world.
To conclude, although it may seem challenging for the workers to step out their comfort zone; the value of cross over the obstacles on the process is unmeasurable. Undoubtedly, which can bring the workers more satisfaction comparing the life when they do similar tasks all day long. Therefore, I fundamentally agree with the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds 80
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 85
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 83
- Regulations for handling and storing coal ash are unnecessary 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether workers are more satisfied when they ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a worker' or simply 'workers'?
Suggestion: a worker; workers
...p our mind in a more dynamic status. If a workers get used to certain type of activity, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04722222222 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85468534081 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8983175299 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.785714286 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394159203772 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142984101658 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225586734366 0.0737576698707 306% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297976713583 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.249925952302 0.0645574589148 387% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.