The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
content://com.android.chrome.FileProvider/images/screenshot/16321376288372007373030.jpg
The maps reveal information on developments of a small theater between 2010 and 2012. Overall, the theater has witnessed massive refurbishment. Its structure has been enlarged and additional equipments have been installed and upgraded.
When looking at the southern part of the theater, the area has been enlarged on the far side in the southwestern corner for the installation of new facilities. Specifically, the admin office has been reshaped and relocated to the northeastern corner opposite the restaurants where used to lay a ticket office. Furthermore, the cafe situated on the right-hand side of the main entrance has been knocked down for the relocation of the Ticket office.
Moving on to describe the remaining part of the maps, it can be seen clearly that two phrases of chairs and the auditorium have not seen any reconstruction while the Stage has been increased in size alongside a newly established hall to the north of it. The storage positioned to the left of the Stage has been moved to a new function room on the opposite site, leaving its original place for the equipment of the Media and new showers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- People who have been close friends for a very long time have recently realised they have some feelings for each other They want to become a couple but afraid of negative consequences Do the advantages of being a couple outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that one world government would be better than a national government Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows average c bon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00531914894 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95060340178 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.408983684 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563632844874 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370266026483 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664458351932 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508121595812 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060892358302 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.