Some people want to meet each other in person to communicate while others want to telephone instead of face-to-face communication. Which of these communication methods do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
It is undeniable that traditional communication is likely to help people clearly understand each other range from thoughts, gestures, or even body language. However, the advent of communication methods like through phone, laptop, or computer has assisted people to connect in an easy way. In my opinion, I prefer to use the telephone rather than face-to-face communication.
Initially, the using telephone to communicate with others is a convenient and time-effective method. When we would like to communicate with foreign friends or kindred in a long-distance, the traditional way might have many difficulties. Meanwhile, people can keep in touch with people easily via technical devices without concern about distance. The modern mediums of communication have paved a way for promptly and convenient communication.
In addition, take business as an example, a company has multiple branches in different regions. If we would like to exchange or debate any problems, the indirect method of communication will solve the many issues. Connecting with other colleagues, holding meetings become rapidly and effective.
Moreover, the breakthrough of science-technique is made us use mostly portable devices. People tend towards contact directly through their telephone. For instance, when we need to meet partners or friends face-to-face, we should contact them before to ask about time, the place. To avoid that they can do busy something or coincide with their schedule. Indeed, if we use the telephone to discuss basic content before we meet, it helps conversation become convenient and productive.
For the reasons I mentioned above, I think that using the telephone is a useful communication way for a lot of people. We can save many time, commute effort. Besides, these telephone devices also use easily, and anyone might make use of them to serve their study and work.
- People have divided opinions on using computers Some say that computers have made their easy But others speak of the complication that computers have brought into their lives Which of these two opinions do you agree with 61
- z 11
- People would like to go to a postsecondary school like a college or university What do you think are their reasons for attending this type of school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- In order to solve traffic problems the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 51
- Solving conflicts arising between persons as well as groups of people is sometimes very much necessary What would be the primary things to think about when solving disagreements among people Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...computer has assisted people to connect in an easy way. In my opinion, I prefer to use the tel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...on way for a lot of people. We can save many time, commute effort. Besides, these telepho...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46735395189 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14949156641 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4839135888 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3888888889 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290843828106 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880162888212 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702455535581 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163786211612 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678029653054 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.