Some people believe that teachers play a more important roles than peers in education of children. To what extent do you agree with this?
The Ecological System theory suggested that teachers and peers belong to the Microsystem layer, which strongest and directly influences children’s development. But, some people still believe that compare with peers, teachers play a more essential role in children’s education. I strongly disagree with this perspective. The below essay will be providing my specific point of view about this debate.
First, peer-learning is beneficial to students as it is easier for children to understand the concepts from the perspectives of someone in their development stage, compare to older teachers. In the school context, the roles of teachers as the person, who enforces disciplinary. It is very difficult for teachers to understand deeply about their students' ideas, dreams, and emotions. But, it’s not a big problem when children learn in a peer group, because they are at the same ages, they can understand each other, and give a sympathetic attitude to others. Second, when put in a peers group to learn, children may also be more open to express themselves around their peers, which is very difficult to do when they are learning and communicate with their teachers. For example, a child can express s/he crazy behaviors with their peers without any judgments. But if they do this with their teachers, they can be punished. The teachers' pressure may decrease students’ creative, and curiosity. Last but not least, children spend almost time around their peers, but not their teachers. When we are talking about Education, we are not only talking about school education, but also about the un-school context. Children can spend much time within their peer group, such as learning, playing, communicating, while they just spend a limited time in the classroom with teachers. So, due to these analyses, we can see that peers group seem to play a more important role in children's education than teachers.
Based on these points of view above, I believe that peer-learning is the best way to children's education. The education system needs to create more opportunities for students to help them connect with their peers and learn from peers group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 10/16/2021 - 22:49 | Jazzy_nguyen | 58 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, while, for example, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23121387283 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78124947793 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8005525208 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291765430302 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101863385504 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878850629229 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228464845137 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592602739192 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.