The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. CD player-DVD player-mobile phone-internet connection. Write at least 150 words.
The line graph indicates the data about using cutting-edge technology transformed with four kinds of devices in households in England from 1994 to 2008. As can be seen clearly from the graph, there was an upward trend in high technology access in each toll over the period shown.
In 1994, the percentage of houses owning CD players started at about 43% and it continued to increase progressively to 2004/05, at nearly 90%. This figure experienced a slight fall after that. The number of mobile phone users stood at under 20% in 1996/97 and went up gradually at approximately 80% in 2004. In the following years, the cell phone proportion stabilized, before rising minimally to around 79% in 2008.
Turning to the homes which install internet, the decade from 1998 witnessed significant growth in accessing numbers. Even though DVD player had no data before 2002, it quickly climbed to more than 82% within 4 years. In 2008, DVD player percentages were highest compared to any other device.
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expressed in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expressed in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expressed in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01807228916 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64655358896 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.746987951807 0.547539520022 136% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2340663066 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157693649168 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553949796184 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027941181742 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963010557529 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330096939889 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.