The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS general test in 2010.
The illustrates display the common band score for the candidate from four language categories attempting the IELTS general test in 2010.
To begin with, out of the four countries, the German students were excellently performed in all three modules except the writing module. also, the French and Indonesia's candidates were getting the equal band score in listening and reading modules. On the other hand, the average performance of the Malay candidates in listening, writing and speaking modules. but in the reading module, they get the highest band score of 6.4 out of the 9.
Moreover, in listening and reading modules the French candidates and Indonesian candidates score equal bands. the French and Malay's candidate performances were equally good and get uniform bands in the speaking module. The Indonesian candidate has achieved a higher score in the speaking module but in the reading and writing module; they get equally poor bands.
Overall, the German students were well performed rather than the other three countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-29 | kachiamoto | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | Jagroop kaur | 100 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | tramnguyen123456 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Khushi Patel | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | singhisking | 89 | view |
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS general test in 2010 56
- Some teachers say students should be organised into groups to study Others argue students should be made to study alone tell the benefits of each to study method which one do you think is more effective 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...hree modules except the writing module. also, the French and Indonesias candidates w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...istening, writing and speaking modules. but in the reading module, they get the hig...
^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ndonesian candidates score equal bands. the French and Malays candidate performance...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37423312883 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60046000962 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496932515337 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.6798046651 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168752036201 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850242161495 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105787547636 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1400584425 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139488230908 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.