The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Presenting the diagram is the manner by which preventing the flooding from streaming into the accommodation.
Overall, it can be seen that both diagrams have involved in common solution which is to have a minimum freeboard of 300 mm from the bottom of the houses to the highest level with is similar to the 100-year flood level.
The first diagram illustrates how this way to protect the house in situations in which houses located a stopbank. As it shows that a barrier separating the river or drain with it’s a hill in which the rainwater might be down into to the ground and also potentially creating an internal ponding, this phenomenon called the internal runoff. In addition, the houses are being laid than the 100-year flood level and its floor at least 300 mm. At the hillside, the floodgate is beneath the foothill which is responsible for opening the gate for the ponding are allowed to drain off into the river or another place.
The second diagrams manifest that the house is put in no stopbank without obstacles from the river or drain from floating to the house areas. At the ground level, it is accumulated to the minimizing of 300mm of freeboard. Furthermore, it measured to the house is above 100 years- flood level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-22 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | HanaVy | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | Chaubui | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | TranMinhDuc | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | quyvo123 | 89 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on relationships Do you agree or disagree 78
- Characteristics we are born with have more influence on our personality and development than experiences we may have in our life Which is the major influence 78
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77209302326 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60222478347 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0493601566 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166291972263 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736615743423 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405431796865 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103451026883 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282699587407 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.