Human beings are being judged according to their social status and material possession. Old fashioned values such as kindness and trust seems no longer important. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (350 words)
The debate over which parameters are being utilized to make judgments about people’s worth and value has been around for sometimes, with renewed interest in whether time-honored values, such as generosity and trustworthiness pale into insignificance in the light of materialism and social hierarchy. While I believe that social hierarchy and material wealth are inaccurate parameters of someone else to some extent, I opine that there are some people who are reasonably envied and admired given their high social rank and material wealth, as will be mentioned in the essay.
Granted, one might argue that materialistic values and social status are the new symbol of personal worth. This is predicated on the assumption that most celebrities today are admired and extolled solely by the colossal amount of money they earn and their far-reaching influence they bear on the society. However, given the complacency they are entangled into as a result of having such enormous material wealth, these celebrities are often swayed into a dissolute lifestyle, turning their backs on their friends, overindulging alcohols and even womanizing. Take Mason Greenwood as an example. Being a football prodigy at a tender age of 19 and being acclaimed all over the globe for his football talent, he subsequently was enmeshed in dissolute activities, such as kerb-crawling and alcohol overconsumption, which later pay a heavy price to his career. Materialism and social ranking, therefore, can never suffice to form a complete and correct impression of others and people still hinge on people’s manifestation of kindness and trust to perceive their characters.
However, there are some people who are deservedly deemed admirable and enviable although they have enormous material possessions and are high in the societal hierarchy. In fact the admiration and judgment based on these factors are not without foundation. To gain a high position in the societal ladder, one undoubtedly must possess a multitude of personal traits such as resilience, patience, unnerving courage and a charitable mind. For example, a leader who could stand out from the rest must develop a sense of courage, perseverance in the face of adversities and hardships. To look for a living example, we can consider the case of Jeff Bezos and Andy Jassy, the CEO of Amazon, the most popular retailing platform on Earth. He once confessed in his autobiography that he has to endured a lot of hardships to reach the heyday of his wealth, from being rejected investment by many companies to the verge of his newborn company’s liquidation. Their hardships taken into account, it is hence comprehensible why people express admiration to such figures.
In conclusion, while I believe that one’s materialistic worth and social hierarchy oftentimes pale in significance when we perceive other people, there is a minority of ones that are commended not by looking at their enormous wealth but by considering the skills and hardships they encounter upon their rise to the top. However, given the fact that most celebrities tend to be complacent about their material assets, time-honored traits such as kindness and honesty should still be valued in today’s society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | huong3312 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | duonghuonglqd | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | duonghuonglqd | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | duonghuonglqd | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | nguyenphamlqd@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Human beings are being judged according to their social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as kindness and trust seems no longer important To what extent do you agree or disagree 350 words 84
- Human beings are being judged according to their social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as kindness and trust seems no longer important To what extent do you agree or disagree 350 words 89
- Human beings are being judged according to their social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as kindness and trust seems no longer important To what extent do you agree or disagree 350 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2714.0 1615.20841683 168% => OK
No of words: 511.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31115459883 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99979766041 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53228962818 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 860.4 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4818543737 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.647058824 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0588235294 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200967115838 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060458754347 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525890885031 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136340885273 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414790205221 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.