weigh assessment of inhabitants of Newtown 2010
The bar chart compared Newtown people's weight into four types namely, obese, overweight, ideal, and underweight in 2010.
Overall, the percentage of the ideal type decreased over ages, while the percentage of obese type grew over ages. In comparison with the two above-mentioned tmodes, there was no regular trend for the overweight type during ages.
The ideal was responsible for 70% of the whole 20-29-year-olds group. In the next age group, the ideal was still ranked first, followed by the overweight with 30%. In the 40-49-year-olds group, there was almost similarity among all types, excepting the underweight with lower than 5%. From the 50-59-year-olds group, the ideal group was not standing first anymore because the obese made up more than half of whole this age group, and also in this group, the underweight is almost near 0%. Moreover, the proportion of the overweight was less than 5% which was as high as same type in 20-29-year-olds group. In the last age group, the share of the ideal reached the lowest point with near 5%, and there was a significant increase for the overweight and the underweight which ranked second and third in this age group, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 57 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passangers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...entage of obese type grew over ages. In comparison with the two above-mentioned tmodes, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04081632653 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88903483579 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1509265714 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0232405651957 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150031638964 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424353557215 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0450094916891 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636530335822 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.