bar chart
The chart provides information on the proportion of three types of businesses access to social media for commerce benefit from 2012 to 2016.
In general, all three kinds of businesses increased through every year, apart from 2015. The greatest usage of social media was a large company, while small businesses comprised the lowest used.
Relating to small and medium companies, the period prolonged from 2012 to 2014 witnessed a climb in social media utilization. To be specific, the small businesses increased marginally, beginning just under 30% little to 35% in 2014. The change is even more pronounced in medium-sized businesses, starting with 30% in 2012, then picked up moderately to approximately 50% after two later years. Both types of businesses suffered a steep reduction in the next year, after that surged up 50% in the final year, more than 20% compared with 2015.
On the contrary, large-sized companies make extensive of social media, with figures nearly always stabilizing in roundly 80% from 2012 to 2016. The sole exception to this was 2015, that the use of social networks saw a plummet by just over 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010 84
- bar chart 51
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain profession because of their gender 61
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, apart from, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11351351351 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71454701972 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.399905033 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0249418452267 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0116390192602 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032920117781 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0261877933354 0.15604864568 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453585885951 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.