Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. It is right to exclude males or females from certain profession because of their gender?
It is widely claimed that males and females have different strengths and weaknesses; therefore, some occupations should be limited to specific gender rather than others. In my perspective, however, wherever and any professions possible, gender evenly should be encouraged.
To begin with, there are some logical arguments for those who believe that why certain posts to remain predominantly male and female. Firstly, several jobs require physical strength, skillful and highly pressured. Firefighters or coal mining and quarrying, for example, should be mainly done by men. Secondly, flight attendant, for instance, is suited for female gender because which needs to be polite, sprightly, elegant, and quickly respond in all situations,those have strongly favored females.
In contrast, in the vast majority of circumstances, gender equality in a range of works created immense benefits. In fact, men and women can bring moderately different viewpoints and procedures to job. Take female police officers as an example, may have a greater understanding and knowledge of domestic violence or childhood abuse, result in having a better range of solutions for coping with this issue. Pediatrician male is able to have a better grasp and comprehensive to young boys character to take care and treat for them precisely.
In conclusion, certain vocations might be necessary to be exclusively related to a particular gender such as customer services and manual labour. In modern society, however, people can have greater freedom of choice in terms of employments. Gender balance brings a great deal of positives and profits for individuals and countries.
- bar chart 51
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 100
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses It is right to exclude males or females from certain profession because of their gender 61
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , those
...t, and quickly respond in all situations,those have strongly favored females. In cont...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'boys'' or 'boy's'?
Suggestion: boys'; boy's
...better grasp and comprehensive to young boys character to take care and treat for th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00849138409 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674603174603 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.03772258 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.692307692 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232519649709 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732302188555 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440001924008 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135192024538 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381859244088 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.