In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In some fields, all have almost equal chance at succeeding regardless of the level of expertise. In most domains, however, having more experience is tantamount to having more chance at succeeding, and most fields of inquiry are not an exception.
Many believe in beginner’s luck and that those who are new to a field are more likely to succeed. Although it could be said that newcomers have a fresh overview of the topic and are unprejudiced, this doesn’t compensate for their lack of exprience and the benefits that come from it. Experts have learned much about the field through trial and error and the suggestions and guidance they have gotten. As a matter of fact, the more knowledge one has about the domain, the more likely he/she will be to make a contribution.
Moreover, most beginners are dependent on experts at the begining. For instance, most amatuers in any field of research need a mentor to guide them through the early stages and familiarize them with the basics to give them a boost into the new field. PhD students and their supervisors are a good example of this matter. Most PhD students are fairly new to the field and depend on the guidance of their much experienced supervisors for making a contribution. Having good and experienced mentors that share their insights could make it possible for the student to make more notable contributions to the field.
On the other hand, the fresh ideas of a newcomer are often overshadowed by his/her naivety. Novel ideas of a beginner combined with the expertise of a veteran of the field, are the best combination for making contributions in any field of inquiry. Therefore, teams that consist of a balanced number of highly motivated beginners with new takes on the matter and knowledgable experts are most likely to make substantial contributions.
To conclude, in fields of inquiry, beginners have valuable qualities such as having a fresh prespective. Although the nessesity of these qualities is irrefutable, it isn’t enough for competing with experienced veterans of the field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Downtown Greensborough is a major financial center in which many citizens either drive or rely on public transportation to get to work This setup has led up to a spate in the number of pedestrians who have been struck and killed by vehicles In an effort t 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04678362573 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87659861688 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6976043669 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192534591693 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695045026867 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497455190201 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112082046577 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438104580743 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.