The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six regions of the world
Discuss summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparison wherever necessary
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of water usage for agriculture, industrial and domestic purposes, in six regions of the world (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and Southeast asia).
Overall, most regions use its water resource for agriculture whereas, North America and Europe make their water resource available for their industries. Domestic usage is comparitively more in South America than other areas.
In terms of agriculture, Central Asia uses around 88% of its water, followed by Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America with 84%, 81%, and 71% respectively. North America and Europe contributes far less compared to other countries (39% and 32% each).
For industrial needs, Europe contributes more than half of its water and secondly, North America gives a little less than half (48%) of its water. However, rest of the regions spends a small fraction of its water for industries. Domestic usage is by far the least water consuming field in all regions of the world except South America (19%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | sangeeth28 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 84
- The diagram below represents the Comparison of how urban Chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011 Summarise the information given in the diagrams Write at least 150 words 70
- Many people believe that the priority of the government should be to ensure a growing economy While others believe that the government should focus its efforts on uplifting the less fortunate Discuss both views 73
- Nowadays parents are allowing their children to use tablets and smartphones to enhance learning Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, secondly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30303030303 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65289834052 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8692545068 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148795228007 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074955272429 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526686891973 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105454525095 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403054797599 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.