Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching.
Art is the form of recreation that can touch the soul with its myriads and special features. The movie is a part of the art which might be for entertainment or the source of teaching something us. Some people intend to watch movies with the aim of revealing their tiredness and making them laugh. However, I am a person who believes that movies which are conveying information from real life can be worthy to watch. In the following essay, I will elaborate on my reasons.
To begin with, movies that teach us something from reality and whatever is happening in our world are more tangible than other movies such as fiction genres. To be more specific, movies that are based on social issues, earth, people, and behaviors are thought-provoking movies that develop the ability of our thoughts about our surrounding world. Moreover, such kinds of movies convey some morals through their high-quality filmmaking strategy, actors, dialogues, or directing. For instance, some time ago I watched a movie named "The Forrest Gump" that is about a little boy who has a mental and physical disorder and is rejected by all friends and society. Although, everybody underestimate him, he tried to learn everything and he was successful after a hard try. The moral of the movie was that never give up even though, nobody believes you. I was so impressed by that movie because of the strong content and breath-taking acting of Tom Hanks.
Second, those movies which are not based on teaching something such as science fiction or horror genres just are full of appealing visual features and are financially expensive. More specifically, these movies are made for entertaining people and show off their latest filmmaking technology nothing more. In spite, they do well in the box office, and spend much budget for their filmmaking, but their movies are just protruding of their features that are attractive for people and do not contribute to social dilemmas or people hurdles. For example, the well-known movie named "Game of Thrones", which has honored with box office hit, is full of actions and actors that are breath-taking for some spectaculars and get the huge budget for its making, while I believe that it does not have anything to teach people except entertaining them.
Overall, I am strongly keen on the opinion that only movies that are based on the real world and teach us something are worthy to watch due to the fact that, they are more tangible and contain some moral for people while, other genres such as fiction just spend budget for visual features and are kind of show off nothing else.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
2022-04-27 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
2022-03-03 | 1SWEAT6 | 70 | view |
- Integrated Writing TPO42 70
- Integrated writing TPO 55 83
- When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation 82
- Integrated Writing TPO 31 70
- TOEFL Integrated writing TPO32 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94545454545 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67890442637 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515909090909 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1563537477 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256219692976 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840378165786 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519812526057 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168574981014 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615696293185 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.