Some people think that more genetically modified food should be produced to cope with the world’s growing population. Do you agree or disagree?
Globally, the issue of whether governments should support genetically modified food due to the increasing population or not has been debated for many years. Some people believe that genetic engineering is not reliable, while this essay argues that gene-modified food is needed to cope with the over-populated world for two reasons. Firstly, it has a stably high yield to tackle with starving. Secondly, more places can be used for agriculture.
To begin with, starvation in many countries can be addressed with genetic modification. More people will be fed with sufficient food since plants such as crops, corns and beans can be changed genetically to have more desirable productivity. In China, for instance, the yield of soybeans that are genetically modified is multi-fold compared to that of natural ones, which enables 1.4 billion Chinese to have a secure soybean supply. Thus, the significantly huge production from gene-changed plants prevents people from the food crisis. This is not the only reason.
Moreover, there will be more agricultural lands especially in developing countries where food issues are exacerbating with a growing population. Plants are more adaptable, with features like greater resilience to pests and better drought tolerance, after being modified genetically. It is possible for residents in a harsh environment like African countries to grow vegetables and crops on their lands with advanced gene technology. In this case, food with genetic modification enables those people in the populous world out of poverty.
This essay has argued that it is worthy to solve the population crisis with the help of genetically modified food for two reasons, namely, the better outcomes and the wider planting lands. All over the world, communities will become much more successful and have a securer food supply with gene modification science.
- People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 42
- 2 The diagrams below show the life cycle o f a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Two floor plans 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44673539519 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91327064944 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3278617593 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384406861994 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129952149902 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772439107921 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25181254509 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471766911509 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.