The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000. The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005.
The bar chart illustrates information about tropical deforestation in different areas during two periods, 1990 to 2000 and 2,000 to 2005, while the figures for causes of this issue were shown by the pie chart. Overall, South America, Africa and Asia indicated the most remarkable levels of deforestation. Additionally, pasture took up for the most part of all causes.
Obviously, the duration between 1990 and 2000 witnessed about 3,575 thousands hectares of forest damaged. The number was moderately rose up to over 4 millions during the next 5 years. Similarly, Asia first stood at the level of 2.5 million in 1990 then increased to nearly 2.8 million in 2000. Meanwhile, there was a slight fall in Africa, from over 3.5 million in 1990 to 3.8 million during 2000 and 2005.
Conversely, Central America, Oceania and North America expressed insignificant and approximate figures, with only the hectares harmed in Oceania from 1990 to 2000 reached 500 thousands. During the latter duration, while Oceania still remained highest of all three at 4.5 millions, both the rest have the number of nearly 3 millions hectares.
In terms of the pie chart, during 2000 and 2005, cattle ranching was mainly responsible for causing deforestation, at 40%, followed by small-scale and large-scale agriculture respectively with 15-20% for each. Logging, however, made up for 5-8% and the most minimal figure was of other sources, at 3% only.
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 Write a report describing the information below 87
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 96
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...rest damaged. The number was moderately rose up to over 4 millions during the next 5...
^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using deforestation, at 40%, followed by small-scale and large-scale agriculture ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22510822511 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79435804316 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0388278991 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34834937614 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116544183174 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11468086194 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199108043403 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107634285414 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.