Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed by a few individuals that protecting all kinds of wild animals is pivotal, whereas some feel that only selected ones should be protected. There are strong arguments on both sides, which will be discussed now. I, however, side with the former view.
On the one hand, the opponents of human protection to all wildlife point out that all animals do not need this aid. There are many animals in jungle whose prolific population is not endangered by any action. Animals, namely horses, camels and cows, are living without any threat. Instead of spending funds on such animals, these limited resources can be reployed to those vital animals who are facing a serious threat of extinction or for those whose natural habitats has been completely destroyed by human interventions. Helping such animals is the need of the hour. This seems to be the proper use of capital and efforts for animal welfare.
On the other hand, the proponents of safeguarding all animals in wild argue that all forms of animal lives are vital and it appears that it is morally wrong to discriminate among the species. Admittedly, more funds are spend on projects to protect exquisite breeds, which are aesthically beautiful and unique. For instance, panda charities receive huge donations because they are charming and cute. The beauty of an animal should not define its value since there are other less appealing ones, for instance rhino, who are significant too to maintain biodiversity. Furthermore they point out that the animals which are presently in abundance, maybe in the future will start to gradually diminish in number if not protected from now onwards. They feel that prevention is better than cure; therefore, why wait for the animal category to go on the verge of extinction before any precautionary measures are implemented to prevent them from exhaustion.
In my opinion, all animals are magnificant creatures of the almighty and should be protected at all cost, be it charming or less plesant.
To conclude, althougth the opponents have pratical concerns, the statements presented by proponents hold more justification. I think, protection should be extented to all animals without any discrimination.
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference from someone who knew you when you were at school Write a letter to one of your old teacher asking for a reference In your letter say what job you have applied for explain why you want this job sug 87
- There are different customs in different countries related to how people eat dress and so on Some think that people visiting a country should behave according to customs of the country they visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
- You play a team sport with some friends Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn t able to play with you over the the weekend You decide to write to him at the hospital telling him about the match Write a letter to your friend In your lette 73
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...the species. Admittedly, more funds are spend on projects to protect exquisite breeds...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...gnificant too to maintain biodiversity. Furthermore they point out that the animals which a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16713091922 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80201242958 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8429234439 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.055555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2903118776 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864951721442 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808629759852 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17418006506 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390290181407 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.