overall score please
The pie chart gives details on many factors that declined agricultural land's productivity. The table demonstrated three different regions of the globe that were affected during the 1990s
Overall, the main reason that caused degradation in land was over-grazing. Besides that, Europe was the region that had the proportion of degraded land higher than the rest.
It can be easily seen from the pie chart that over-grazing made up more than a quarter of the percentage of factors that had a poor effect on worldwide land. Following was deforestation and over-cultivation that constituted 30% and 28% respectively. Meanwhile, just only a mere 7% of other features that have an effect on land
Europe was the region that heavily affected by these cause with the total of 23% of land was degraded. Nearly 9.8% was allocated by deforestation and 7.7% came from over-cultivation that were the highest, compared to the remain. North America was the region that was less effected with just only 5% of agricultural land had unproductiveness. All of the factors allocated just under a very small amount with 0,2%, 3,3% and 1,5% respectively for 3 categories in the table. Oceania which gained a 13% impressively had a minority composed of over-gazing compared to 2 region, while other factors accounted just under 2%.
In conclusion, over-gazing had the highest percentage of all of the reasons and Europe was the region that was heavily affected
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 9.8% was allocated by deforestation and 7.7% came from over-cultivation that wer...
^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tion that were the highest, compared to the remain. North America was the region that was ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...agricultural land had unproductiveness. All of the factors allocated just under a very sma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...y composed of over-gazing compared to 2 region, while other factors accounted just und...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...er-gazing had the highest percentage of all of the reasons and Europe was the region that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16595744681 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09065092378 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548936170213 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1585342827 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.