Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s modern world, technology has brought astronomical influences to people’s lives, especially in the way they shop. Some people then contend that this media has fostered easier and more effective purchases while others oppose this. From my point of view, although there are certain downsides of technology and gadgets to shopping, I believe the benefits are more justifiable.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that shopping through apps and websites can mislead consumers into fraudulent purchases. It is obvious that with the proliferation of the Internet and different technological gadgets, people are more inclined to buy online, which based on advertising and the like. However, salespeople can glorify the products by putting them in the best light possible, thus deceiving the consumers about the quality. Moreover, buyers cannot examine the goods in person to see either the materials or origin. As a result, their shopping can be full of disillusionment.
On the other hand, I advocate that technology can facilitate and support people’s purchases in a more convenient and efficient way. Without a doubt, the online shopping or shipping system is not only a big boon for time-and-energy-saving styles of buying goods, but it also caters manifold choices and categories of products. Hence, there would be no need to commute to stores to spend astronomical time to select but people can make purchases with a click on the screen. According to anecdotal surveys by businesses, over 85% of consumers have reported excellent reactions towards their purchases with the aid of technology.
In conclusion, although technology can, to some extent, cause several problems in terms of shopping, I am convinced that the bright sides are manifold as it encourages constructive purchases as well as offers ample choices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | hieu13092006 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | hieu13092006 | 11 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38408304498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07936704646 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629757785467 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4434004388 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180946641441 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611112687053 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603144871622 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109933126981 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863444646126 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.