Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals’ health than consuming ready meals.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that it is beneficial for humans’ well-being to prepare and eat food at home instead of using ready meals. I wholeheartedly agree with this assertion.
In my opinion, people can be assured of the origins and quality of food when cooking at home. We can make sure that we are using fresh food, manage the number of nutrients as well as reduce the number of resources that pose a threat to our healths. As a piece of evidence, certain restaurants are likely to place a priority on the appearance and the flavor of their food, therefore, they may utilize toxic chemicals like food coloring and other additives to make meals appear more attractive and delicious. As a result, individuals are at a higher risk of contracting diseases, particularly food poisoning.
Moreover, cooking at home is a significant way to save families’ expenditure. The fact is that dining out costs more than preparing meals at home. For instance, in recent years, people including office workers with average income and students tend to consume fast food because these types of food are tasty and allow people to save time in the kitchen. However, fast food buyers have to pay a huge amount of money, which can be double or triple that of the payment for purchasing fresh and raw food and cooking it at home.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I believe that it is advantageous for individuals to cook meals at home as a way to safeguard themselves and their family’s well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-27 | augenstern314 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86046511628 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77608144827 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0639187748 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159111075994 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664241353801 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418806210525 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114811936534 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385806012444 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.