The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs give information about the registration of foreign and Australian students in their universities from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, the number of enrolments of local students was higher than overseas students, while the commencing rate for both students was less than the total rate.
In the first period, there were about 20000 overseas students who applied to a university while the commencing number was quite lower, which took place about 15000. In the next seven years, there was a significant rose in the number of overseas registration, which was tripled for this figure in 2001, yet this figure for commencing number increased slightly to above 20000. From 2007 to 2010, there was a similar trend between total and commencing numbers, which grew gradually and reached those peak at 80000 and 40000 respectively.
In 2001, the quantity of local registration was doubled for this figure of overseas enrolments, yet the portion of commencing enrolments made up at approximately 20000. Next, the number of local registration witnessed an upward trend in 7 years, which climbed up rapidly and reached the highest point at 60000, while this figure for commencing experienced a fluctuation trend, which fluctuated slightly to 20000 registration in 2007. Finally, the number of local registration remained stable at its peak while this figure for commencing fluctuated to more than 20000 in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | smiley | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | thaodim123 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | DRgio | 84 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- There is an opinion that students should spend time learning about the science of food and the process of making it rather than studying important subjects Personally I disagree with this school of thought although it leads students to a healthy life Gran 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31838565022 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82232761916 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479820627803 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7352350552 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120268577025 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738264063046 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685694290449 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113293941238 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632498991874 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.