Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative trend?
Rivalry between individuals and between organizations can be seen as an essential factor of development, which is sorely needed for a sustainable society. This essay will discuss how the competitiveness influences humans and therefore prove that it is truly a beneficial character.
To make it clear, it is obvious that adverse effects would occur when establishments or people compete. For example, when two agricultural companies try to outweigh the other, they might harm the local environment as a result of intensive farming. However, as we can see in this occasion, harmful effects only happen when people compete in a harmful way.
Meanwhile, throughout the history, competitiveness actually generated innovation to the world. In an attempt to take leading positions, students got smarter, and then they became high-quality intellectual labours. It was also the rivalry between Samsung and Apple that brought to the invention of cutting-edge smartphones. In the light of such developments, it is obvious that the human being could not have achieved the modern society nowadays if there was no competitiveness between people.
Additionally, when it comes to the business world, competitiveness plays an important role in maintaining stability to the national economy. Without rivalry between enterprises, one may take the predominance and therefore manipulate the domestic market. It can control the price of its product while customers cannot help buying from it. Take Apple again as an example, the company used to dominate others in smart tablet area, which allowed to sell its iPad with extremely expensive price, until Samsung joined the competition and therefore made iPad price phase out quickly. Consequently, by competing fairly, the market will be more equal to the customer, in which they are provided a wide range of selection.
In conclusion, if used in a good way, competitiveness will create novel innovation to the society, and also maintain an equal market to the customer. Therefore, under my consideration, this is a positive trend.
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Today some families are not eating meals together on a daily basis Why Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 11
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite e ect Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmful way" with adverb for "harmful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...effects only happen when people compete in a harmful way. Meanwhile, throughout the history,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'selling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: selling
...ers in smart tablet area, which allowed to sell its iPad with extremely expensive price...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18290723043 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5156219108 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168408627268 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495707352949 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427360567692 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912121274039 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381129123368 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.