“Teamwork offers a lot of benefits in modern society.”
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, teamwork is believed to be beneficial. Meanwhile, the others think that the negative impacts of working as a team outweigh the positive sides. To put it into perspective, teamwork can be seen as a positive activity.
To commence with, discussion in a group area is a good activity to tackle problems. As the idea is contributed by different members, a group can form a notion which involves these ideas comprehensively. It leads directly to the success of a project and it has become an essential part of a group. For example, to set up a project, it needs more than one person to be responsible for each field, namely Human Resource, Digital Marketing and Managers. Each has its own function and contributes to the overall procedure of the project.
In addition, teamwork can enhance productivity. When they merge as a group, they tend to have the morale and responsibilities to create their own value. Working as an individual can be regarded as a productive way to work but they are likely to fall into a procrastination state. For instance, working with the Pomodoro technique is a way to finish a single task but multitasking is impossible since the brain can not proceed to cope with tasks immediately, they are likely to put it off. When it comes to teamwork, the task is divided into a single part then they can finish them without being burned out.
In conclusion, teamwork brings in its wake benefits to modern society. People should take teamwork as a part of their working style and develop personalities to work as a team.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82156133829 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97555720137 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8327467767 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725682049569 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345669003727 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546786843629 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061897171337 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529411359679 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.