Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Some people contend that several museums and historical sites have become common destinations among tourists. Meanwhile many local dwellers do not come to join in. This essay will analyze some main reasons as well as a measures to encourage local people to pay a visit to such places
The induces for a huge difference in the number of the two sites of visitors are varied. Firstly, Local people who are familiar with their traditional customs and history This is because local people think that they do not need set foot in the places due to the high cost of tickets to visit. Besides, local citizens tend to work instead of wasting time moving to museums. However, they may be attracted by views of the museums or curious to investigate.
There are some measures to attract local inhabitants to visit museums and historical sites. To begin with, those places should have several services for both education and entertainment purposes. Furthermore, those places should construct more zone games to increase more local dwellers. For instance, construct more adventure activities to assist people to have experience as well and take a rest. Furthermore, those places should be constructed with many beautiful views that will attract a number of people not only tourists but also local dwellers who will come to visit or snap a photo. Besides, Local people have more time to hang out with their families.
In conclusion, there are two principal issues that local people are disinterested in spending their time visiting. That is why those places should take action to deal with those problems to raise the significance of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-11 | jaytran000 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | jaytran000 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | jaytran000 | 66 | view |
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 66
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ome common destinations among tourists. Meanwhile many local dwellers do not come to join...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a measure' or simply 'measures'?
Suggestion: a measure; measures
...ll analyze some main reasons as well as a measures to encourage local people to pay a visi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to set'?
Suggestion: to set
...ocal people think that they do not need set foot in the places due to the high cost...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04814814815 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59122980056 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0533292185 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432390767171 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147450933212 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777074066657 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259764321432 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799414748118 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.