Some people say that professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers who make a greater contribution to society should be paid more than sports athletes and entertainment stars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an increasingly growing popular idea that it is the intellectual who show a great dedication should be given adequate remuneration rather than celebrities. I, however, believe in the veracity of wage equality no matter which fields do they devote, and this essay will tackle the most crucial reasons why.
This is primarily due to the fact that there is no point in underestimating a job by comparing it to the others, due to the distinguished occupational purpose and the job characteristics. It is undoubted that in every professional environment, employees have tendencies to sacrify themselves, especially their grey matter to fulfill fame, fortune and ambition, eventhough they are white-collar worker or the showbiz. To be specific, inspite of becoming a reowned actress, Ann Hathaway had a significant contribution in fighting against domestic violence without any payment, which is a sensitive issue rarely do people dare to speak up.
On the other hand, inspite of career diversity, it is the effort people make that has a great impact on their remunerations. In all fields, even showbiz or medical, only after employees pay close heed to their work, satisfyingly accomplish them by determined attempt do they deserve high salaries, but not which job they choose To shed light on this issue, some doctors prioritizing how much they are paid will not have an ideal income as ones who concentrates on their patients.
Granted, in some situations such as Covid-19 Pandemic, medical employees are taken priority on account of their significance when saving patients’ lives. Still, I would like to emphasize that entertainment and sports industries still have intangible values on spiritual lives, and also the diplomatic dimension.
In conclusion, payments mostly depend on their personal attempt and career purpose. Thus, in my perspective,wage discrimination should not appear among different jobs on the grounds of its unfairness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | mminhhchau | 89 | view |
- he graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people say that professional workers such as doctors nurses and teachers who make a greater contribution to society should be paid more than sports athletes and entertainment stars To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 84
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wage
... career purpose. Thus, in my perspective,wage discrimination should not appear among ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41830065359 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1820870758 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660130718954 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4399080245 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138960914864 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437998267868 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292445900911 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650358473208 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233936233542 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.