Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only government and large companies can make a difference. What extent do you agree or disagree ?
In present era, environment concerns become major issues because of overpopulation and proliferation of population. These problems are increased day by day. Therefore, some people think that legal authorities and big business communities are abled to tackle these issues instead of individuals. According to my outlook, both public and legal authorities play vital role in this criteria and reasons are justified in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, expand in pollution rate is major reason for degradation of environment. Therefore, citizens are more responsible for this issue. Because, on public places, residents litter garbage which includes plastic paper, bags and bottles so on. Due to which, soil becomes degrade which leads to soil pollution. Some people prefer smoking on such sites which releases harmful gases leads to exploitation of atmosphere and rise of toxicity in air. Hence, if individuals prohibited such practices on public sites and promote to put garbage in dustbins. And also aware other residents about major environment concerns. As a result, such problems become overcome.
On contrast, legal authorities and big companies also represents dominant character to tackle environment problems. In this criteria, law makers should pass strict laws on littering waste and such practices which leads to pollution. Therefore, if citizens promote such tasks, thus they pay penalty for this. Due to which, they avoid these tasks. Moreover, legal authorities also organise awareness programmes to provide information regards value of environment and their preservation methods. As a result, this promote awareness in public due to which they prefer to conserve environment.
To recapitulate, it seems to me as, couple of citizens and legal communities represents superior image to overcome issue of environment. Because, both play equal role and are responsible for its preservation and exploitation to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 21 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000
- The chart shows information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- Online shopping is significantly increasing What effect does this have people what are the demerits and what are the job opportunities 84
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nd legal authorities play vital role in this criteria and reasons are justified in f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cter to tackle environment problems. In this criteria, law makers should pass strict...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6955017301 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01747959854 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9059808629 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.45 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0293091754118 0.244688304435 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00989201194978 0.084324248473 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183596775882 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164140486087 0.151304729494 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113440279204 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.