The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The line chart demonstrates the lifts occurring in three different places of crime in Newport city center between 2003 and 2012.
Looking at the chart, it is clear that while there was a plateau in car theft and robbery, a significant drop was witnessed in burglary portion at the same period. It is apparent that throughout the given period, the percentage of burglary decreased dramatically out of three types examined. In 2003, there was nearly 3500 of burglaries. This figure rose drastically to 3750 cases in 2004, which hit a low of over 1000 in 2008, before fluctuating to about 1500 in the next 3 years.
At the beginning of the period, car theft witnessed approximately 3000 cases occurring in the inner city from 2003 to 2005. This figure then dropped quickly to 2000 in 2006, followed by a recovery back at the initial number in 2012. A similar trend was seen in robbery. There was over 500 cases thieving from the person in 2003, this figure then fluctuated slightly in the next 8 years, before reaching the initial number at the end of the period, making robbery be the least crime happening in the city.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-15 | Кабулбек Кабулязов | 78 | view |
2021-12-26 | ngchi_3603 | view | |
2021-12-25 | ngchi_3603 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort city center between 2003 and 2012. Looking at the chart, it is clear that w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to about 1500 in the next 3 years. At the beginning of the period, car thef...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72448979592 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5491421657 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0158707669 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178003413745 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745893329619 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791807137331 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154400396239 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884440257117 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.