The chart below shows the changes in 3 different areas of crime in Manchester city from 2003-2012
The graph gives information about how many burglaries, car theft and robbery types of crimes committed in Manchester city between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, the number of burglary experienced a dramatic decline, while car theft and robbery did not change remarkably in the years provided. However, the most crimes by far were seen in burglary in 2004.
To start with, virtually 3,500 burglaries occurred in 2003, and, after a year, the figure rose noticeably peaking at about 3,750. But, it saw a sharp decrease until 2008 reaching just over 1,000. The burglaries fluctuated from 2008 to 2012 and ended with approximately 1,400.
Regarding with car theft and robbery, they were less popular type of crime at the beginning of the period. The former dropped during early 4 years at more than 2,000, and the figure grew significantly with some oscillations in the next years provided. The opposite trend was seen in the latter, around 500 robberies committed in 2003. Then, they fell ending with almost the same number in 2012.
- The chart below shows the changes in 3 different areas of crime in Manchester city from 2003 2012 78
- The chart below shows the changes in 3 different areas of crime in Manchester city from 2003 2012 78
- The chart below shows the changes in 3 different areas of crime in Manchester city from 2003 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the beginning of the period. The former dropped during early 4 years at more tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07058823529 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55066312024 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664705882353 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9719001529 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150205109734 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586406047346 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574240963426 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100893411523 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620822566956 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.