Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
There class="is">is no shortage of class="opinion">opinion on the primary qualifications class="that">that a class="teacher">teacher class="must">must posses to deliver and attrack his students. Some class="prefer">prefer teachers with an excellent knowlede on the class="subject">subject matter whereas others class="prefer">prefer mentors with ablility to deliver the teachings in effective way. class="if">if I were asked to choose, I would definitely prioritize class="teacher">teacher with an ability to relate class="well">well with students. I firmly believe this because of class="two">two specific reasons class="that">that I will elaborate in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, teaching class="is">is a class="two">two way street. The main objective class="is">is to class="transfer">transfer one's knowledge and idea unto another. So, class="teacher">teacher class="must">must be capable of relating with the needs of the class="student">student and class="plan">plan his teaching class="method">method accordingly. Drawing from class="my">my class="own">own personal experience, a lecturer in class="my">my undergraduate program used to class="teach">teach class="us">us with the class="help">help of presentation slides. Usually, class="he">he used to outline the basic points of the topic in the class="slide">slide and explain the details orally. personally, I found his teaching class="method">method very cumbersome and inefficient. Most of the students in the class were either busy doodling or brooding. Clearly, this lecturer has in depth knowledge about the class="subject">subject but can't relate with class="student">student's need of new teaching approach. For this reason, I believe effective knowledge class="transfer">transfer class="is">is only possible class="if">if a class="teacher">teacher can relate to the need of class="student">student's teaching class="method">method.
Similalrly, class="teacher">teacher who can relate to the students can easily comprehend his students intellectual level. While teaching any class, a class="teacher">teacher class="must">must realise his audience, whether they are of begineers level or an intermediate or an advanced level. this helps class="teacher">teacher to identify starting point for lectures. I class="must">must admit class="my">my class="opinion">opinion class="is">is profoundly influenced by class="my">my class="own">own personal experience. class="my">my professor of Hydropower Engineering, before commencing his course for the semester used to take a pre-qualification test. From this test, class="he">he deduces the intellectual level of the students attending his class and on the basis of class="that">that class="he">he used to class="plan">plan his lectures. As his classes were modeled as per our requirements, it was every interesting and effective. it class="is">is clear to see why class="teacher">teacher who can relate to students' need thrives.
In the light of forementioned reasons, in class="my">my class="opinion">opinion, a class="teacher">teacher's ability ot relate class="well">well with students class="is">is more important than excellent knowledge of the class="subject">subject being taught.
- Eco Ceritified Wood 3
- The shrimping industry relies on trawls for its harvest Trawls are huge nets that are dragged behind boats in order to catch shrimp Other animals like sea turtles are often caught inside these nets and soon die without sufficient oxygen To help reduce the 60
- Voting System 76
- Eco certified Wood 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cations class='that'>that a class='teacher'>teacher cla...
^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...deliver the teachings in effective way. class='if'>if I were asked to ch...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... class='transfer'>transfer ones knowledge and idea unto another. So, cl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 876, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the class='slide'>slide and explain the details orally. personal...
^^
Line 4, column 910, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...;slide and explain the details orally. personally, I found his teaching class='metho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1181, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...lass='subject'>subject but cant relate with class='student'&g...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;>transfer class='is'>is only possible class='if'>i...
^^
Line 4, column 1394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lass='is'>is only possible class='if'>if a class=&apos...
^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r an intermediate or an advanced level. this helps class='teacher'>teac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 652, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...s;own'>own personal experience. class='my'>my professor of Hydro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...it was every interesting and effective. it class='is'>is clear to see...
^^
Line 7, column 1138, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...was every interesting and effective. it class='is'>is clear to see why c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, so, well, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3633.0 1977.66487455 184% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 9.36340206186 4.8611393121 193% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 10.0401266745 2.67179642975 376% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528350515464 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 973.8 618.680645161 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.5 1.51630824373 165% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 74.864298722 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.136363636 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0538215396508 0.236089414692 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382820698042 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451684584937 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648645328496 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436816952286 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.5 11.7677419355 268% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -21.92 58.1214874552 -38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.1575268817 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 36.71 10.9000537634 337% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.