With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
With the advent of the Internet and other technological marvels, online communication and cellular messaging has gained enormous popularity in our contemporary life. As a result, there exists a widespread concern that this tendency may make the traditional form of communication pale into insignificance. While this school of thought seems appealed to me to some extent, I also argue that distant communication cannot entirely replace face to face method.
To begin with, the proliferation of the Internet and mobile devices has scaled back face to face communication. Firstly, communicating via the Internet is more convenient on the grounds it can alleviate the problem of geographical distance. Instead of having to travel from one place to another, people now can send instant messages or make video calls in a few seconds no matter where they are. This practice has proved much useful, especially to acquaintances or relatives who live in far-flung areas.
Secondly, there are inevitable situations in which one to one communication is impossible. Take the Covid 19 pandemic as a case in point, when everyone has to work from home due to social distancing policy. Thanks to communication apps such as Zoom or Google Meet, people can still attend online business meetings, preventing important appointments and interviews from being disrupted.
On the other hand, face to face communication still remains an integral part in our life. First of all, it is the best way to express our feelings and affection towards each other, while instant messages or online texts cannot convey our ideas in the most thorough manner. Moreover, it is by virtue of physical presence that our human being can maintain long-term relationships and gain better understanding about other people. That's why face to face communication is of great prominence when it comes to socializing with others.
Furthermore, there are some cases in which communicating in person is more suitable than distant method. For example, some important political negotiations or business meetings require outstanding corporate culture and the very presence of the attendees so that the final agreement or task fulfilment can be efficiently obtained. In such cases, direct meetings seem to be more ideal for these purposes.
In conclusion, that the Internet and cellular messaging has become one of the most powerful facilitator for communicating with each other is unquestionable, however this doesn't mean the death knell of face to face communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...etter understanding about other people. Thats why face to face communication is of gr...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h other is unquestionable, however this doesnt mean the death knell of face to face co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10971826709 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579746835443 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6653943835 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313288988693 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980763639966 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935164476371 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16734587974 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964622684135 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.