Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate.
What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages to this?
In our temporary world, the Internet connection makes everything easy to do and communication is not an exception. Thanks to the Internet, it's a piece of cake for citizens all around the world to make friends with ones who are far away. This essay will analyze the pros and cons of this phenomenon.
It is undeniable that the Internet makes people come closer. Social networks like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others contribute a lot to worldwide communication. With the Internet connection, users can easily make friends with others who are thousands of kilometers away.
They talk to each other via just a keyboard and a screen. Take myself as an example. Last month, I found an app which allows me to find people who want to speak English to chat and make phone calls. I made friends with a French teenager and we communicate in English. To be honest, I bet that I would never have a chance to meet him without using that app.
On the other hand, the drawbacks still exist. Internet users probably meet people who are mental terorrior. They can be a nightmare to the victims. According to a small survey in my city, there are 10% interviewees who were asked confessed they suffered from online sexual harrasment. Their Internet friends sent them sensitive photos, videos and messages.
In conclusion, online communication has two sides. People should self-protect from risks that exist online. The Internet can be the best tool to make friends and communicate but it can also be the biggest fear in one's lifetime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...t an exception. Thanks to the Internet, its a piece of cake for citizens all around...
^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ers can easily make friends with others who are thousands of kilometers away. They tal...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... but it can also be the biggest fear in ones lifetime.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87692307692 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70271614422 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8415397949 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7368421053 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6842105263 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05263157895 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24856638267 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713385184737 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577459735872 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135738102558 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526956636794 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.