In many countries in the world, the population is aging rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare. A nations’s population should pay for their healthcare provision in future. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is to be noted that there is a rapid increase in the numbers of those who are becoming older. Considering the fact that this would reflect in the cost of public healthcare negatively, it is assumed that the tax-payer has to shed more money to pay for their healthcare provisions in future. I too feel the same.
In order to understand the situation, one has to assess the social structure, which is continuously changing. In the past, the aged were respected and was included as an integral part of every family. However, the situation has now changed, as they are moved to specialised centres soon after geriatric problems appear on them. It should be also seen that the life expectancy has increased due to improvements in healthcare system.
The associated problem with this change, which is considered as the most pressing is the financial liabilities. To explain in further, when an aged person moves to a professional setup, naturally the cost of his health care and personal care would go higher. Initially, these costs can be covered by the person’s pension or retirement benefits, but later, it would most probably result in financial crises, which can hardly be bearable by a family in general.
Another factor which I would add to support my view is that governments can never escape from their responsibility to care these people. In fact these people, at their productive ages, worked hard for the overall development of their respective countries, and it is quite rational to think that the state has to return them something at their vulnerable age.
To conclude, it is a fact that the aging population and the cost of treating them are increasing simultaneously. When assessing the existing social and financial situations, it is most likely that the responsibility of bearing the expense of healthcare of this population would become greater on the tax-payer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | view | |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- test In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 89
- Some people today believe that the world s increase in population is unsustainable and will eventually lead to a global crisis Other people believe that world population increase is necessary and beneficial as it creates the growth of the world s economy 73
- test In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... to pay for their healthcare provisions in future. I too feel the same. In order to un...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, as to, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04458598726 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91049350682 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8202574003 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226488700366 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706889724504 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713574160679 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128846322992 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730697900186 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.