The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table gives information about consumer spending in three major categories in five different countries in 2002.
Clearly, the most frequently purchased products in all five nations were food, drinks and tobacco, whereas people spent the least on the clothing/wear and the leisure/education.
According to the table, Turkish people paid the most for food/drinks/tobacco, which made up for roughly 34% of the total. The percentage of consumer expenditure in the same category in Ireland ranked second, at almost 28,91%. The Spanish also spent about 18,80% of the total consumer expenditure on basic items such as food, drink and tobacco.
It can be seen that Italy was the country where the proportion of spending on the clothing and wear was the highest, at about 9%, while the lowest was seen in Sweden, at about 5,4%. On the other hand, Turkey had a slight percentage of consumer expenditure in the leisure/education (approximately 4.35%). In comparison with Turkey, people spent the least on the same area, at roughly 1.98% in Spain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table shows the obesity rate in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that people have the right to university education and government should make it free no matter what their financial background To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart shows the change in forested land in different regions of the world over time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart and table provide data about cars registered in one country over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...isure/education approximately 4.35%. In comparison with Turkey, people spent the least on ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11675215424 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4907772941 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2125692438 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105660738551 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191671340948 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187755086617 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243434366731 0.0819641961636 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.