In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection.
Third, in a great many cases, frog populations are in decline simply because their natural habitats are threatened. Since most frog species lay their eggs in water, they are dependent on water and wetland habitats. Many such habitats are threatened by human activities, including excessive water use or the draining of wetlands to make them suitable for development. If key water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog sp
The article proposes methods to solve the problem of declining frog populations. However, the professor says that these methods are not practical.
First, the article explains that the pesticides harm frogs population after attacking their nervous system, so if the laws prohibit the farmers from using them near sensitive frogs population, it would decrease the harm to frogs. In contrast, the professor says that prohibiting the use of the pecticide is not economically practicle, and it will cause sever disadvantage to the farmers because it will affect their crops.
Second, according to the article, the skin fungus is a major factor in frog population decline. applying antifungal medication in a large skill will protect frog populations from this infection. In response, the professor disagrees with this method. antifungal medication must be individually applied which is very defficalt and expensive. In addition to that, the medication must be applied again and again which make this method complicated.
Third, the article suggests that protecting the water habitats such as lakes from excessive use and development will help many frog species to recover. according to the professor, the global warming is the reason that the water habitats are threatened, so protecting the water from the excessive use will not help in preventing the disappearing of the water habitats which in turn will not help in letting frog populations to recover.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-11 | sanddy | 80 | view |
2023-07-18 | dxy40747 | 3 | view |
2023-07-11 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
2023-07-10 | zuhn | 80 | view |
2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 71 | view |
- A person should never make an important decision alone 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 71
- TPO 19 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 32 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Applying
...ajor factor in frog population decline. applying antifungal medication in a large skill...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor in frog population decline. applying antifungal medication in a large skill w...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Antifungal
...e professor disagrees with this method. antifungal medication must be individually applied...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...will help many frog species to recover. according to the professor, the global warming is...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40969162996 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85914283362 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2460845649 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.636363636 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131034745127 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543990544216 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364528299397 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824239546425 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151171804159 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.