Social networking sites are believed to influence badly on the society
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social networking sites are likely the most effective tool in researching and connecting people - to - people. But in some opinions, these social platforms maintain a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. And this essay will discuss both agree and disagree points of view.
To begin with, we can not deny that social platforms such as Facebook play an integral part to our life. Especially when it first comes out that these sites could effectively support various kinds of jobs: multi-media public relation, digital marketing,... People who work in these aspects often go on Facebook or Instagram to analyze their clients’ insights, or the markets’ requirements, or simply some up-to-date things so that they can catch up with the flow and provide the most appropriate products. Many companies are trying to shift their main markets into social media, and this has already brought them enormous profits. And second of all, these platforms have created a huge innovation in connecting people - to- people. We are living in the COVID - 19 pandemic era, where all offline daily activities have turned into online ones. If it was not for social networking sites, society would not be allowed to meet their basic needs such as communicating or interacting.
On the other hand, these social platforms still maintain various drawbacks. , they cause addiction in teenagers, who mostly can not manage their time and can easily get overusing status. Based on some social research reports, social media has programmed an algorithm to keep the users concentrating on their newsfeed without noticing their other works. This has led to a perspective that instead of focusing on their study or work, the youth will choose to spend all day long on Facebook, Instagram to entertain themselves. As a result, we have observed/witnessed an exponential rise in teenagers who are in crisis after losing their track of work due to social networks. And the “users analyzing programmes” mentioned above brings out the second threat of social media - identity theft. The users would easily get exposed about their personal information. It used to be a lawsuit between Facebook and the Australian government for Facebook had invaded and illegally analyzed users data for approximately a decade.
From my perspective, the government should promulgate appropriate laws about the Internet environment, so not only it can ensure the users’ privacy, but also not to deteriorate the potential that social media platforms can give us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...media public relation, digital marketing,... People who work in these aspects ofte...
^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'era' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'eras'.
Suggestion: eras
...e are living in the COVID - 19 pandemic era, where all offline daily activities hav...
^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...forms still maintain various drawbacks. , they cause addiction in teenagers, who ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30099502488 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86136713916 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594527363184 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0929962478 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.157894737 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110230779482 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382230448931 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416531397532 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788486200871 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523608844351 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.