Some people say that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives you the opportunity to give back.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this contemporary society, it is generally believed that wealthy individuals are given the opportunity to devote what they have earned to the community. Personally, I totally concur with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, it is beneficial for people in the upper class when they dedicate their assets to others. First, by contribute to the community, the rich will be able to support those who are underprivileged. As a result, by giving a hand to the poor, rich people can gain more support and attract public attention, giving them more fame and enhance their social status. Taking Ms Phuong Hang, who is an incredibly successful business woman in Vietnam, as an example, during the Covid 19 lockdown, she has helped the local community by giving free oxygen tanks to the local medical camps in order to support patients who were infected with the virus. Hence, she has become a role model for a number of people because of her generous gesture.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, numerous people from the elite choose to devote their own money in hope of supporting other people. A large group of wealthy people have a notion that doing charity can help them accumulate more positivity. In addition to this, these people also believe that helping others can give them a sense of comfort and partially release negative energy. Another aspect that is worth mentioning is that some individuals hold a belief that their assets will not be carried along with them to the afterlife. Therefore, instead of keeping, these people choose to provide aid to people in underdeveloped areas as they may think that their actions can somehow become their legacy once they pass away.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that it is essential for the rich to financially support others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 80
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Animal habitats have been destroyed and some animal species e g the tiger and the rhino have become endangered Why does this happen What can be done to protect endangered animals 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lockdown' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lockdowns'.
Suggestion: lockdowns
...nam, as an example, during the Covid 19 lockdown, she has helped the local community by ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06270627063 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73022482425 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0795985948 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185157202224 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669033408999 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375308705089 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107817297087 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320552224148 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.