Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
When it talks about whether it is reasonable to present all the information, even the confidential messages, to the public to ensure their rights, I think both policies would have some advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, when the governing institutions choose to expose all the information of the society, it is undeniable that it would cause turmoil in the society and troubles for the government. On the other hand, when people get access to the secrete information, it is dubious that they could tackle all the problems wisely.
To begin with, is it necessary or even desirable of political leaders to withhold information from the public? The answer is yes, because the category of the information is very complex. Some unimportant messages, such the forecast of the weather, should inform the habitats as soon as possible, because they are closely related to the welfare of the public. But the reality is that most information which is received by the military or the government is threatening and dangerous. When it is exposed to the public, parsimonious affairs would make the situation out of control, which is unacceptable. So it is actually protective reactions for the government withholding some information to avoid detrimental effects.
Secondly, how about the privilege of the public? They believe that when they are informed of all kinds of information, they would make their own decisions from the aspect of individual interests. But, is it reasonable? They make the assumptions that they have the wisdom and strategies to tackle all the problems even the coming of atomic bombs. They also have the illusion that their interests would never be spoiled and invaded even the whole country has been destroyed. We all know that when people live in the whole society, their prestige and wealth are entitled by other people. When the whole society face catastrophes, these things become nonsense. So, their desire to make troubles for the government and call for all secrete information is insane. Their reasons are also tenuous when they lack the basic trust for their government.
To sum up, when people calm down, they would find that a large number of jeopardy and quandaries is out of their competence. When you hinge on the government for protection, you should put trust in your government and avoid being credulous and shun some gossips.
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager Last week all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one third 74
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people
- The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony Last year however private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the 60
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... people calm down, they would find that a large number of jeopardy and quandaries is out of their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, second, secondly, so, i think, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08483290488 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80521272214 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488431876607 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8890362163 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279743983191 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910998014047 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101900473024 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171813515377 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109605025595 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... people calm down, they would find that a large number of jeopardy and quandaries is out of their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, second, secondly, so, i think, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08483290488 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80521272214 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488431876607 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8890362163 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279743983191 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910998014047 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101900473024 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171813515377 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109605025595 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.