The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013
The bar chart provides a comparison of the number of Internet users in Greece, Canada, Denmark, and the average world for 15 years starting in 1998
Overall, looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that an upward trend was witnessed in the number of Internet users in all countries and the world average. It is also notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark registered the highest figure.
In 1998, nearly 26,000 people in Canada accessed the internet. Which makes them the group with the highest rate of users for the period. Meanwhile, that figure for Danish was relatively smaller at roughly 22,000. Surged both numbers in 2003, yet Denmark overtook the dominant figure of Canada to have the largest number of Internet users until the end of the period, reaching 95,000 people as compared to 88,000 in Canada.
In contrast, Greece had the lowest number of Internet users, at only 3,000 in 1988, compares to 4,000 of the world average. However, the figure for Greek progressed gradually to reach 63,000 in 2013, which left that number of the word average behind with only 35,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Nguyễn Đinh Tường Vi | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | Nguyễn Đinh Tường Vi | view | |
| 2023-05-23 | Nguyên-MTTN | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | MAI THỊ LAN ANH | view | |
| 2022-05-04 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 78
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...so notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark registered the highest fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30725700845 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6891421399 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250619453516 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104270184815 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941348353288 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179155608394 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714741918148 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.