For the students (aged 5-10), is it better to take a break
for every one hour of instruction or let them focus on
lessons for a longer period of time?
It Is crucially important for the student to have breaks between lessons they are learning. In this regard, some believe that having a long-term exposing to the lessons is more beneficial for students (age 5-10). Others, including me, hold this view that children would benefit from intermittent breaks during their learning. I will delve into it, with two explanations, which I delineate in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, scientific approaches could contribute to obtain better outcomes for this topic. To elaborate, experiments show that periodic breaks would have promising effects on children. As I read in an academic journal, for example, there was research about the break influence on children’s learning ability. In this research, students were divided into two groups. The first group was assigned to take more time focusing on the school material with no more break ups, the other groups, on the other hand, attain small breakups after one hour of learning. The results were remarkable. The firs group feel destressed after the experiment and had disappointing grades, however, the other group not only achieve better grades, they show psychologically improvement at the end of the test.
Another equivalent reason is children should know that there is not the classes the important thing. To clarify, putting all efforts and time on school schedules, excluding them to spent time on activities they really like. This would, as a consequence, affect their future life. They would become individuals who are good at math or biology, however, they lack communication skills or a sense of entertainment in their life. Beside they have lessons thought, they should develop other person capabilities which they can benefit in their future life.
To sum up, not only it is proven scientifically that periodic breakups are much more beneficial for students (age 5-10), it would provide time devoting on other activities which guarantee their success in their future steps in their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-09 | neriman | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | zg1122 | 76 | view |
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 68
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from wha 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... learning. The results were remarkable. The firs group feel destressed after the ex...
^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss in their future steps in their life.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, for example, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75729324407 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6869067771 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1764705882 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245531924543 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739083427478 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780617723181 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152930396723 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687760061264 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.