The graph chart and table below gives information about water use in wordwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The graph chart and table represents the uses of water globally and two specific countries.
It is clearly evident that globally water consumption rate was higher than these mentioned countries. In the graph, the huge bulk of water used in in cultivation sector while domestic sector used rate were too much poor and in the table brazil uses more water than his counterpart.
In 1990, internationally water using rate were all 500 cubic km while two other sector used it minimally as almost 200 cubic km and 100 cubic km respectively. Water consumption rate in cultivation sector augmented slowly but the rate of two other sector remained static from 1910 to 1950. From 1950, both agricultural and industrial use showed more upward trend till the ending year of the graph and food producing sector used more water. However, in the year of 1970, domestic uses of water soared till the last moment but it is always lower than two other sector.
In the table, Brazil had more irriguted land than Democratic Republic of Congo. That is why Congo used less water than Brazil and the rate were 8 cubic meter while brazil used it as 359 cubic meter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | ESTAKUR RAHMAN MUNNA | 73 | view |
- The diagram illustrates how brick is manufacture 78
- Many scientists believe that now we can study the behaviour of a three year old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals To what extent do you think crime is determined by human nature Is it possible to stop children frim growing up to be cr 56
- The first bar chart showed number of marriage and divorces in the USA and second bar chart produces maritial status of adult Americans 1970 and 2000 78
- The key solution for the environmental issues for the current generation to live a less comfortable life to benefit future generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph chart and table below gives information about water use in wordwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... the graph, the huge bulk of water used in in cultivation sector while domestic secto...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...e were all 500 cubic km while two other sector used it minimally as almost 200 cubic k...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...mented slowly but the rate of two other sector remained static from 1910 to 1950. Fro...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slowly but the rate of two other sector remained static from 1910 to 1950. From ...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...10 to 1950. From 1950, both agricultural and industrial use showed more upward tr...
^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...t but it is always lower than two other sector. In the table, Brazil had more irri...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...r than Brazil and the rate were 8 cubic meter while brazil used it as 359 cubic meter...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...meter while brazil used it as 359 cubic meter.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81313131313 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42553101275 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.817663686 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292841360536 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153099275073 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979516652435 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231612676641 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104907394012 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.